quem paga?

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/10/4/russias-nuclear-plants-are-ageing-who-will-pay-to-dismantle-them

já sabemos.

a floresta tropical foi muito mais:

https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/cm4gvnv14zlgo

já o sabíamos.

Embora não concordasse com a terminologia estava e estou completamente de acordo com o Afonso Cautela sobre isto:

#

ITER is a major international project to build a tokamak fusion device designed to prove the feasibility of fusion as a large-scale and carbon-free source of energy. The goal of ITER is to operate at 500 MW (for at least 400 seconds continuously) with 50 MW of plasma heating power input. It appears that an additional 300 MWe of electricity input may be required in operation. No electricity will be generated at ITER.

estão a meter-nos o dedo no dito.

talvez seja útil:

https://www.noticiasaominuto.com/economia/3062063/paineis-solares-compensam-quanto-se-poupa-simulador-ajuda-a-decidir

todavia....

E que aqui não falhamos:

https://www.elsaltodiario.com/gas-natural/absueltos-activistas-greenpeace-bloquearon-buque-metanero-puerto-sagunto

contra mais, maias, mais e ainda por cima ilegal!

e nem sequer é debaixo do tapete, é à descarada:

https://www.rfi.fr/en/environment/20260925-edf-faces-legal-action-over-france-s-continuing-nuclear-ties-with-russia-seversk

continuamos a municiar a Rússia que destrói a Ucrânia e por sua vez também armamos a Ucrânia que tenta destruir a Rússia, que destrói a Ucrânia, que

E de pensamento:

https://edificioseenergia.pt/noticias/um-parque-edificado-envelhecido-e-a-necessidade-de-renovar-o-que-propoe-a-arquitectura-publica-2030/

Tenho grande estima e apreço pelo Viriato, com quem tive desavenças que o tempo levou, e li com grande empatia este artigo anexo, que é o melhor da revista Manifesto, e que envio com autorização dele.

 Dizia eu, no inicio da invasão, que a guerra não teria fim sem diálogo e não violência. Veja-se o cenário, os milhares de mortos, a enorme destruição.

O texto que junto do V.S.M. é, como dizem na minha terra, caro, valioso!

aqui explicamos timtim por timtim:

https://thebulletin.org/2026/10/ai-doesnt-need-superintelligence-or-evil-intent-to-start-a-nuclear-war

e ficamos ainda vivos, mas....

Statement Letter sent to The Guardian, regards

 https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/oct/05/green-party-nuclear-power-policy

The Green Party has taken a wrong turn on nuclear.

UK households already pay what amounts to a nuclear tax to fund Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C, among the world’s most expensive nuclear projects. Meanwhile, renewables generate 52% of UK electricity – more than four times nuclear’s contribution.

Globally, the contrast is starker. In 2025, solar capacity grew by 510GW and wind by 159GW, against just 1.5GW for nuclear: a 462:1 ratio. Renewables supplied 85.6% of new global generating capacity. Nuclear now adds in a year roughly what renewables add every two days.

With 20-plus-year construction times, repeated delays and huge cost overruns, new nuclear diverts scarce resources from faster options. Renewables, storage, efficiency and stronger grids can deliver much more for every pound spent.

Nuclear is increasingly marginal: too costly and too slow for the climate and energy challenges we face. For the UK, the direction of travel is clear.

Co-signed

Dr Paul Dorfman, Bennett Scholar, Bennett Institute, University of Sussex

Tom Burke CBE, Former CEO of Friends of the Earth and the Green Alliance.

Dr Ian Fairlie, Vice President, CND

Dr Phil Johnstone, Visiting Fellow, Global Studies, University of Sussex

Jonathon Porritt, Writer and Campaigner on Sustainable Development

Prof Andy Stirling, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex

Dr David Toke, Reader in Energy Politics, University of Aberdeen

Prof Steve Thomas, Emeritus Professor of Energy Policy, University of Greenwich

Prof Brian Wynne, Emeritus Professor of Science Studies, University of Lancaster